<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>URBEINGRECORDED &#187; pdf</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.urbeingrecorded.com/news/tag/pdf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.urbeingrecorded.com/news</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:38:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How to keep PDF relevant? Flash and semantics.</title>
		<link>http://www.urbeingrecorded.com/news/2009/01/12/how-to-keep-pdf-relevant-flash-and-semantics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.urbeingrecorded.com/news/2009/01/12/how-to-keep-pdf-relevant-flash-and-semantics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chris arkenberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[soft serv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloudagents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pdf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urbeingrecorded.com/news/?p=292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My thoughts submitted to the Adobe Reader Blog for the post Take the Adobe Reader Survey. As a former Adobe employee who worked on Acrobat &#038; PDF I have a lot of personal interest in seeing the format grow and evolve.
The growing public perception is that PDF is too bulky and increasingly too opaque for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My thoughts submitted to the Adobe Reader Blog for the post <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/adobereader/2009/01/take_the_adobe_reader_survey_a.html">Take the Adobe Reader Survey</a>. As a former Adobe employee who worked on Acrobat &#038; PDF I have a lot of personal interest in seeing the format grow and evolve.</p>
<p>The growing public perception is that PDF is too bulky and increasingly too opaque for the networked world. This is because PDF&#8217;s have not kept up with the prevailing trends of transparency, findability, and collaboration. PDF is important as a container with certain rights &#038; privileges (DigSig, Security, Markup, Forms), but the data inside a PDF is far more important. Currently, PDF&#8217;s are way too opaque, too bloated, and do not clearly convey value to most users. This is especially true on mobile (why would I chose to view PDF on mobile if not required by an enterprise I need to engage with?). For most enterprises and customers, PDF is a cloud of data more than a display standard. It&#8217;s value is no longer in consistent display of fonts and formatting. It&#8217;s in the data within the millions of PDF&#8217;s that the IRS has, for example. Even as a Forms front-end it&#8217;s difficult to see why Reader/Acrobat is a better solution than a robust customizable Flash interface. The Flash-based Portfolios feature is a step in this direction.</p>
<p>How can Reader add value to the massive volumes of archival PDF that already exist? Answer: 1) replace Reader with a robust, customizable Flash front-end, and 2) engineer semantic data* into new &#038; existing PDF&#8217;s so that cloud agents can sift through the documents and return meaningful results. Both of these strategies should focus heavily on supporting Live Cycle for both distilling and evaluation of PDF&#8217;s. </p>
<p>The static viewer model is dying. People need to be able to search, sort, find, annotate, and share. Reader is already too heavy to be of value in a browser, much less on a mobile device. Any mobile solution must dis-aggregate formatting from data and be able to dynamically reconfigure the display to present only the important data/form elements to the mobile user. At the very least, PDF&#8217;s need some serious reformatting before they can be of any real value on the mobile platform. There&#8217;s just not enough real estate. Furthermore, any PDF-mobile solution must begin with the realization that mobile = personal, collaborative, locative. </p>
<p>If Adobe doesn&#8217;t do this, you can bet there will be lucrative opportunities for others who understand that the value of data is no longer in it&#8217;s formatting. It&#8217;s in accessibility and structured reporting. Frankly, any business intelligence solution that doesn&#8217;t address the growing heap of PDF&#8217;s lying in their servers will fail to really leverage their own data effectively.</p>
<p>* I think I&#8217;m starting to use the term &#8220;semantic&#8221; a bit loosely. Essentially, I&#8217;m suggesting that Acrobat should engineer active creation of RDF structures inside PDF COS and as header info. PDFLib should extend to support both writing &#038; reading of this framework. Likewise, top-down text analysis should spider both doc text and COS to construct relevant metadata (RDF &#038; taxonomies) written into the PDF file header. The point is to make PDF&#8217;s as transparent &#038; searchable as possible to those actors &#038; agents with access rights.
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.urbeingrecorded.com%2Fnews%2F2009%2F01%2F12%2Fhow-to-keep-pdf-relevant-flash-and-semantics%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.urbeingrecorded.com%2Fnews%2F2009%2F01%2F12%2Fhow-to-keep-pdf-relevant-flash-and-semantics%2F&amp;source=chris23&amp;style=compact&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.urbeingrecorded.com/news/2009/01/12/how-to-keep-pdf-relevant-flash-and-semantics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
